Credit agencies blasted
at hearing
March 25, 2004
By Marcy Gordon
The Associated Press
WASHINGTON - Hidden charges, high fees and even failure
to send payments to creditors of debt-laden consumers
are widespread among newer credit counseling agencies,
senators and federal regulators said at a hearing
Wednesday.
As senators cracked open the counseling industry and its
complex webs of companies and interlaced executives, the
president of one company invoked his Fifth Amendment
right against self-incrimination and refused to answer
questions.
Credit counseling companies, which often advertise
heavily, portray themselves as offering a refuge for
consumers drowning in debt. But lawmakers, regulators
and consumer groups say some counseling agencies trade
on their nonprofit status to gouge customers and end up
plunging them deeper into debt.
Each year, an estimated 9 million Americans have some
contact with credit counseling agencies -- often the
last stop before bankruptcy filings.
One of them was retired museum director Raymond Schuck.
Saddled with $90,000 in credit-card and bank debt, he
heard an ad on the radio and called Cambridge Credit
Counseling. Schuck said he was promised lower interest
rates and was asked to make a monthly payment of $1,946
-- but the money didn't make it to his creditors as it
was supposed to.
"My credit rating was completely ruined because of late
payments" and he eventually filed for bankruptcy, Schuck
told the hearing of the Senate Governmental Affairs
Committee's investigative panel.
A report prepared by the panel's bipartisan staff found
that consumer complaints are on the rise as new
companies come into the credit counseling business and
abuses proliferate. The investigators found a pattern of
abuse among some counseling agencies, especially new
entrants to the field.
"Clearly, something is wrong with the credit counseling
industry," said Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., chairman of
the investigative subcommittee. "Our investigation has
revealed common patterns of improper conduct" by new
entrants.
Internal Revenue Service audits of 50 credit counseling
agencies "may very well" result in some of them being
stripped of their nonprofit tax exemptions or even being
referred for criminal investigation to the Justice
Department, IRS Commissioner Mark Everson testified to
the subcommittee.
Thomas Leary, a member of the Federal Trade Commission,
said, "We remain concerned about deceptive practices in
the credit counseling industry."
Former employees of Cambridge Credit and AmeriDebt Inc.,
who also testified, told of having to use fake names,
"boiler room" sales operations and pressure on
commission-paid counselors to get consumers to pay stiff
upfront fees, with no counseling or debt education
provided.
Officials of the two companies disputed the accounts of
the former customers and employees. They said their
companies act responsibly and provide a valuable service
to consumers.
Chris Viale, chief operating officer of Cambridge
Credit, called the accounts "unfair and distorted
accusations."
"There is a popular notion that performance incentives
encourage counselors to act in their own best interests
rather than in the interests of consumers," Viale said.
"This is not true."
As senators grilled the officials about industry
practices, the president of Debtworks Inc., Andris Pukke,
asserted his Fifth Amendment right in refusing to
testify.
The for-profit Debtworks, Pukke and his brother are
among several parties named in a lawsuit filed by the
state of Missouri against AmeriDebt in September.
Debtworks was formed in 1999 when AmeriDebt spun off its
processing function for consumer debt plans and turned
it into a for-profit business owned and controlled by
Pukke, according to the Senate investigators.
With personal bankruptcies surging to record levels
nationwide, there is a deep pool of customers for credit
counseling companies.
Credit counselors historically have been financed by
banks that issue credit cards, but those contributions
have been declining, forcing counseling agencies to
charge fees.
Credit counseling works by putting consumers who cannot
afford to make all their payments into debt management
programs that allow them to consolidate their debts from
several credit cards, reduce their monthly payments and
lower their interest rates. Consumers agree to destroy
their credit cards, not take out new credit and make a
monthly payment to the counseling agency, which
distributes it to creditors.
But new entrants -- rather than relying on contributions
to nonprofit counseling agencies from credit card
companies or small fees paid by consumers -- use a
different structure. They have nonprofit agencies that
generate "massive revenues" paid by consumers for a
for-profit affiliate for advertising, marketing and
executives' salaries, according to the Senate report.
AmeriDebt, based in Germantown, Md., has been sued by
the Federal Trade Commission, five states and consumers.
The FTC alleged that the company used deceptive
marketing to bilk hundreds of thousands of customers and
failed to educate people about how to get out of debt.
The regulators also alleged that AmeriDebt made
customers believe that an initial fee would be part of
their debt-reduction payments to creditors -- but it
instead went to AmeriDebt.
The company has disputed the regulators' allegations. It
says it offers customers educational services and that
the debt-reduction payments are "voluntary
contributions."
|